en_US English
en_US English es_ES Español
FREE CONSULTATION - (512) 980-0000
LIVECHAT
Skip to content

Main Navigation

FREE CONSULTATION - (512) 980-0000
LIVECHAT
  • About Us
    About us
    • Hire a personal injury lawyer
    • How you'll get your medicalbills paid
    • Whether an Austin Personal Injury Lawyer Can Help You
    • Whether you can afford to hire us
    • Call to speak with anattorney right now
    • Our Offices
    • Community
    • Working With Other Lawyers

    Our only goal is justice for our clients…
    whatever that means for them.

  • Attorneys
    Attorneys
    • Meet Our Team of Lawyers
    • Justinian C. Lane, Owner
    • Dustin Fox, Managing Partner
    • Erik Walker, Lead Attorney
    • Amber M. Pang Parra, Mass Torts and Veterans Law
    • Kevin Johnson, Personal Injury

    Our law firm is driven first and foremost
    by a sense of Justice.

  • How Were You Injured?
    How were you Injured?
    • 2021 Texas Winter Storm Damage
    • 18-Wheeler Accidents
    • Car Accidents
    • Motorcycle Wrecks
    • Wrongful Death
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Product Liability and Dangerous Products
    • Bus and Rail Accidents
    • Dog Bite and Animal Attacks
    • See more
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Prescription Drug Injuries
    • Medical Device Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation
    • Boating Accidents
    • Texas Tort Law
    • Premises Liability
    • US Veteran Disability

    An injury changes lives...
    sometimes forever.

  • faqs
  • Legal Resources
    Legal resources
    • Agent Orange and Vietnam Veterans
    • Asbestos and mesothelioma
    • Dangerous prescription drugs
    • Defective medical devices
    • Family members
    • Abilify
    • Bair Hugger
    • Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics (FLQ)
    • See more
    • Invokana
    • Inferior Vena Cava Filters (IVC Filters)
    • Metal On Metal Hip Implants
    • Mirena IUD
    • Onglyza
    • Power Morcellators
    • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIS)
    • Roundup Herbicide (Glyphosate)
    • Talc / Talcum Powder
    • Taxotere
    • Viagra and Cialis (sildenafil)
    • How Long You Have To Take Certain Actions
    • Product Liability Theories
    • Personal Injury and Mass Tort Videos

    We offer legal resources and self help
    for those who have been injured.

  • Case results
  • Client Reviews
  • Agent Orange and Vietnam Veterans
  • Asbestos and mesothelioma
  • Prescription drugs
  • Defective Medical Devices
  • Family Members
  • Abilify
  • Bair Hugger
  • Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics (FLQ)
  • Invokana
  • Inferior Vena Cava Filters (IVC Filters)
  • Metal On Metal Hip Implants
  • Mirena IUD
  • Onglyza
  • Power Morcellators
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIS)
  • Roundup Herbicide (Glyphosate)
  • Talc / Talcum Powder
  • Taxotere
  • Viagra and Cialis (sildenafil)
  • Product Liability Theories
  • Personal Injury and Mass Tort Videos
  • How Long You Have To Take Certain Actions

We offer legal resources
and self help for those
who have been injured.

Legal Resources

Austin Personal Injury Attorney – Power Morcellators

Laparoscopic Power Morcellators and Cancer

  • Have you or a loved one undergone laparoscopic hysterectomy or large fibroid removal?
  • Was a power morcellator used?
  • Were you or a loved one later diagnosed with cancer?

You may be entitled to compensation for your injuries.

What are Laparoscopic Power Morcellators?

First approved by the FDA in 1995, laparoscopic power morcellators (LPMs) are medical devices used for the removal of uterine fibroids, as well as for hysterectomies.

Essentially, morcellators are tubes with blades.

Surgeons make a small incision (called a port incision) in the patient’s abdomen.

The morcellator is inserted through the port incision and the device grinds or cuts up tissues, such as uterine fibroids, or the whole uterus if being used for a hysterectomy.

The ground tissues are removed via the port incision. The procedure is labelled as minimally invasive and the smaller incision lowers the amount of recovery time needed, as well as reducing the risk of infections and other complications.

Morcellators and Manufacturers

  • FemRx – Diva Morcellator
  • Hologic – MyoSure
  • Lumenis Inc. – VersaCut Morcellator
  • Ethicon Gynecare – X-Tract
  • Ethicon Gynecare – Morcellex Tissue Morcellator
  • Ethicon – Morcellex Sigma
  • Interlace Medical – Hysteroscopic Morcellator
  • Smith & Nephew – Trueclear Hysteroscopic Morcellator
  • Olympus – PlasmaSORD
  • Olympus – Gyrus PKS PlasmaSORD
  • Nouvag – Morcellator TCM3000BL
  • Blue Endo – MOREsolution Tissue Morcellator
  • LiNA Medical – Xcise Cordless Laparoscopic Morcellator
  • Karl Storz – Rotocut G1, G2, Steiner, and Sawalhell Supercut Morcellator
  • Richard Wolf – Morce-Power 2306 Electronic Morcellator

What are Uterine Fibroids?

Uterine fibroids are benign tumors growing in the uterine wall. Also known as leiomyomata, uterine fibroids vary in size and number by patient. Infertility, miscarriages and early onset labor often go hand-in-hand with uterine fibroids.

Certain studies show that most American women will have fibroids at some point in their lives. In fact, studies show that by age 50, roughly 70% of Caucasian women and 80% of African American women had fibroids.

Quite often, fibroids don’t cause noticeable symptoms and the women who have them may not even know it.

Treatment Of Uterine Fibroids

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), there are numerous ways of treating symptomatic fibroids. However, when uterine fibroids are present in high numbers or are causing the patient pain, doctors often recommend surgery. Quite often this means hysterectomy. Over 200,000 hysterectomies due to uterine fibroids are performed every year, with annual direct health care costs in excess of $2.1 billion.

What Is The Problem With Laparoscopic Power Morcellators?

Quite often, morcellation leaves small pieces of ground up tissue in the patient’s abdomen. Studies suggest that around 1 out of every 350 women who have a myomectomy (surgical removal of uterine fibroids) or hysterectomy using a laparoscopic power morcellator could have an undiagnosed sarcoma (cancer).

If this is the case, the cancerous tissue is ground up along with the fibroids and/or the uterus and this tissue is spread throughout the patient’s abdominal cavity. Sadly, this can cause what may have otherwise been a containable, controllable cancer to aggressively spread. This increases the possibility that women may die as a result of the undiagnosed cancer that would not have spread but for the use of a morcellator.

There Are Various Types Of Cancer Linked To Morcellation

  • Leiomyosarcoma (LMS)
  • Uterine cancer
  • Endometrial stromal sarcoma
  • Uterine sarcoma
  • Parasitic myomas

Laparoscopic Power Morcellators And The Risks To Women

Roughly 1 in 350 women have undiagnosed uterine cancer.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration estimates that 1 in 500 women have the highly-aggressive cancer, leiomyosarcoma.

The Agency’s estimates are supported by a study published by the Journal of the American Medical Society (JAMA) in 2014. The study examined data from 233,000 women who underwent LPM hysterectomies between 2006 and 2012.

Why have doctors favored Laparoscopic Power Morcellators if they are dangerous?

Only 1 in every 10,000 women in the general population has undiagnosed uterine cancer, leading doctors to believe that morcellation, especially using the tissue containing bags, was a low-risk procedure.

Unfortunately, women who undergo hysterectomies are a subset of the general population. They often experience pain and bleeding, symptoms of large fibroids and also symptoms of cancer. At present, there isn’t a reliable method of determining if a woman having a hysterectomy with morcellation has cancer until post-surgery, when it is often too late.

Some Physicians and Researchers Raise Concern Over Power Morcellators

Amy Reed, MD and Hooman Noorchashm, MD

Not all doctors are pro-morcellation. In fact, two doctors are working hard to inform the public of the risks involved with morcellators:

Dr. Amy Reed underwent myomectomy with morcellation and was diagnosed with cancer in 2013. She and her husband, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, are working to prevent others from enduring the difficulties they are facing.

American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)

In 2011, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a committee opinion that “vaginal hysterectomy is the approach of choice whenever feasible, based on its well-documented advantages and lower complication rates.”

FBI Investigation of Power Morcellator Manufacturer

In May 2015, the FBI began investigating one LPM manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division, to determine how much the company knew about the risks involved with LPM use before the company pulled its products from the market in July 2014.

Congressional Action Over Power Morcellator Dangers

Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA), an advocate for women’s health issues, wrote a letter to the FDA demanding answers as to the Agency’s lack of action when Ethicon and three hospitals failed to report deaths that were linked to LPM use.

The Dangers of Laparoscopic Power Morcellators Have Been Known For Decades

Shockingly, a study conducted in 1998 showed that laparoscopic power morcellators did spread ground up tissue throughout the patient’s abdominal cavity during morcellation.

Retained Myoma after Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy with Morcellation. Hutchins, et al. 1998

Despite the fact that this risk has been known since at least 1998, LPM manufacturers have not adequately warned patients or doctors of the risk.

Instead, LPM risks have been described to doctors or patients as merely “side effects.”

Some Insurance Companies Will Not Cover Power Morcellation

Perhaps in response to increased awareness of the dangers of laparoscopic power morcellators, even insurance companies are beginning to drop coverage for procedures involving LPMs. They include Aetna, Inc. and HCA Holdings. Collectively, these insurers cover over 123 million people.

Food And Drug Administration Action On Laparoscopic Power Morcellators

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates all types of consumer products, including medication and medical devices such as LPMs.

The FDA agency has take a number of actions to address potential injuries by LPMs:

Tissue Containment Bags

In April 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tissue containment bags for use with laparoscopic power morcellators (LPMs) in an attempt to mitigate their risk.

However, the FDA warned that the bags may not necessarily be effective in reducing the risk of spreading cancerous tissues during morcellation.

Additionally, the use of tissue containment bags carries its own set of risks:

  • Infection
  • Organ Damage
  • Additional / Longer Surgeries

FDA Safety Communication On Laparoscopic Power Morcellators

In April 2014, rthe U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety communication warning doctors not to use morcellation in the “vast majority” of myomectomies and hysterectomies.

The warning read in part:

“If laparoscopic power morcellation is performed in women with unsuspected uterine sarcoma, there is a risk that the procedure will spread the cancerous tissue within the abdomen and pelvis, significantly worsening the patient’s likelihood of long-term survival. For this reason, and because there is no reliable method for predicting whether a woman with fibroids may have a uterine sarcoma, the FDA discourages the use of laparoscopic power morcellation during hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids.”

FDA Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel

On July 10, 2014 the FDA Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel met to evaluate the risks and benefits of using LPMs for minimally invasive hysterectomies for symptomatic uterine fibroids and for myomectomies.

This risk/benefit evaluation led to uncertain results and the recommendation that the devices not be used due to:

  • The unreliable methods and difficulty for doctors to diagnose cancers before the LPM procedure;
  • The risk of spreading unsuspected malignant tissue during morcellation;
  • The complexity of finding methods to mitigate the risk.

November 24, 2014, FDA Warning

In this update of the April 2014 warning, the Agency reiterated its original warning against using LPMs in the vast majority of women undergoing myomectomies and hysterectomies.

It also recommended, in an Immediately in Effect (IIE) guidance, that LPM makers add a Black Box warning and two contraindications to their product labels with specific safety statements.

  • FDA Black Box Warning. A black box warning is the FDA’s strictest warning for drugs and medical devices for sale to the public. Black box warnings inform the public and health care providers can have the most serious side effects, including severe injury and death.

This IIE guidance allowed the Agency to continue to issue recommendations in an expeditious manner to address a serious public health issue. In part, the update read:

“The boxed warning informs health care providers and patients that:

  • Uterine tissue may contain unsuspected cancer
  • The use of laparoscopic power morcellators during fibroid surgery may spread cancer and decrease the long-term survival of patients. This information should be shared with patients when considering surgery with the use of these devices.
  • Laparoscopic power morcellators are contraindicated (should not be used) for:
    • Removal of uterine tissue containing suspected fibroids in patients who are: peri- or post-menopausal, or candidates for en bloc tissue removal (removing tissue intact) through the vagina or mini-laparotomy incision.
      (These groups of women represent the majority of women with fibroids who undergo hysterectomy and myomectomy.)
    • Gynecologic surgery in which the tissue to be morcellated is known or suspected to be cancerous.”

Some Laparoscopic Power Morcellators Pulled from the Market

J&J’s Ethicon division stopped all global sales of LPMs shortly after the April 2014 FDA warning.

Then on June 30, 2014, Ethicon withdrew its LPMs from the market. The company called the action a “worldwide market withdrawal” as opposed to an official recall.

The devices affected by this voluntary market withdrawal included:

  • Gynecare Morcellex
  • Morcellex Sigma
  • Gynecare X-Tract

Laparoscopic Power Morcellator Personal Injury Lawsuits

The majority of suits filed are against Ethicon, but injured women have also sued Olympus Corporation, Lina Medical, Richard Wolf, Karl Storz and Gyrus ACMI.

These Personal Injury Lawsuits Address Cancer Allegedly Linked To Laparoscipic Power Morcellation

Several of the injured women have been diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma, which is a particularly aggressive form of uterine cancer. These women were diagnosed with cancer following robot-assisted, morcellator hysterectomies.

Many of the injured women only learned of the increased risk of cancer through conducting their own research into the issue. They believe, rightly so, that the manufacturers failed to properly warn them and their doctors of this risk.

They allege that the LPM makers knew or should have known of the risks, but did nothing.

Texas Power Morcellator Personal Lawsuits And Multi-District Litigation (MDL)

When a person or company hurts a group of people in similar ways, those people can sometimes combine their lawsuits. One way of doing that is called a multi-district litigation (MDL).

In an MDL, the people suing (the plaintiffs) are often in different districts. But an MDL allows them to share the cost of a lawsuit. The court handles all of the cases’ pre-trial proceedings (discovery, etc.) at once.

  • There are several lawsuits to recover for injuries like cancer that patients were diagnosed with after the use of laparoscopic power morcellators.
  • The lawsuits have been centralized in a multi-district litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for Kansas, Judge Kathryn H. Vratil presiding.

We are experienced in dealing with dangerous medical device suits and MDLs and we will fight for you.

Why You Should Seek Legal Assistance

Laparoscopic Power Morcellator  Injury Lawsuits Can Be Complex to Prove

Winning a mass tort lawsuit for injuries caused by laparoscopic power morcellators can involve proving that manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson or Ethicon did not properly warn people taking it of the potential risks.

That can include investigating medical studies, corporate publications and using testimony from experts on how the medication caused an injury. This is not easily done, particularly when drug companies show up with an army of lawyers.

But battling bullies is what Justinian & Associates does. 

We Are Warriors For The Injured

Our Austin and San Antonio mass tort lawyers have successfully represented many victims injured by defective medical products. That’s exactly why we were founded.

As our record demonstrates, Justinian & Associates has the legal knowledge,  experience, resources, attorneys and trained investigators to take on adversaries of any size.

All we do is fight for injured victims.

Our only goal is justice for our clients, whatever that means for them.

We do not accept defeat. Unless we get you monetary compensation for your injuries, you won’t pay us a dime.

Your Rights Can Be Lost If You Wait

Lawsuits for injuries caused by Laparoscopic Power Mocellators are going on across the country, in many state and federal courts.

There are laws that limit how much time you have to file a lawsuit after being injured. They are known as statutes of limitation. They may apply to your lawsuit to recover for your power morcellator injuries. The countdown may already have begun.

Additional limitations may be imposed pursuant to certain settlement agreements with the various device manufacturers.

If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with cancer after a myomectomy or hysterectomy using a laparoscopic power morcellator, now is the time to seek legal assistance.

If you are not sure whether or not you qualify to receive damages, don’t worry. Call, text or email us for a free consultation, with no obligation.

Speak to an Austin personal injury attorney from Justinian & Associates (not a “screener” or paralegal) to understand your rights.

We’re here for you and will do everything we can to help you receive the compensation you deserve. We’re on your side.

Justinian Means Justice.

Whether you’re injured in a car accident, in need of personal injury help, or have another legal matter, we want to be the law firm that you entrust with your case. We welcome any and all legal questions and will respond very quickly to your message.

All of our consultations are always free.

Phone: (512) 980-0000
Email: contactus@justinian.com

Austin

8770 Research Blvd. Austin, TX 78758

Round Rock

2704 Meister Pl. Round Rock, TX 78664

San Antonio

7042 Alamo Downs Parkway, Suite 370. San Antonio, TX 78238

    About Us Attorneys How Were You Injured? Legal Resources faqs Case results Client Reviews
    Personal Injury Blog Privacy Policy Sitemap

    ©2021 Justinian & Associates PLLC, Personal Injury Lawyers.

    The content on this website is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute the formation of an attorney-client relationship nor is it to be considered legal advice. However, if you are in need of legal advice we are just a phone call, an email, or a contact form away. Or we’re happy to meet you in person at one of our offices where walk-ins are always welcome.